top of page
CDR library
Search


πͺπΊ Most people in carbon removal canβt tell you the difference between the EU Commission, the Council and the Parliament.
π They should. These three institutions are writing the rules for our sector, including what role removals play in the EU ETS, arguably the hottest file in Brussels right now. π€ If you know who to talk to and when, you get a say in those rules. π DECODE is my free six-day email course on EU CDR policy. Over 1,000 people have taken it. π¨ Lesson 1 goes out when you sign up: https://lnkd.in/e4ViTbMC
Oct 12


π₯ LEAK: MEP Peter Liese's draft report goes big on CDR! π₯
π As expected, the EU Parliament's Rapporteur on the Emission Trading System Revision Peter Liese is pushing for significant changes to the Commission's proposal. A Contexte leak of the [soon to be published] draft shows how far Liese wants to go: β‘οΈ Start date in 2029 instead of 2031 β‘οΈ Biochar added to the eligible pathways alongside DACCS and BioCCS with a 20% cap β‘οΈ [Uncapped] additional allowances to be auctioned to cover a potential price gap β
And much more. This is v
Sep 10


π¨π³ What is the potential of biochar carbon removal in China? π¨π³
π‘ The question is when, not if, China will become a - or the - global leader in carbon removals. π€© I remain puzzled how little is reported about the status quo and potential. As such, I was thrilled to see this study by Han et al (2026) which looks at the potential of retrofitting Chinaβs existing biomass plants (N = 426) with pyrolysis units for residual biomass only. π What did it find? Up to 30Mt of carbon removal per year through BCR could be done through retrofitting
Mar 9
bottom of page
.png)