🧑‍💻 LinkedIn is FLOODED with AI slop nowadays. And climate influencers are no exception. Many of us are increasingly delegating our most time consuming task - content generation - to LLMs. 🤯 What I find particularly shocking, is that many of these blatantly 100% LLM written posts go viral and gather a ton of engagement. 🧓 Call me old-school, but I think this is a loss. I value authenticity, creative insight, and analysis above all. If we continue on this path, this platfo

I expect this year to mark a step-change for CDR in at least three ways: 1️⃣ Formal recognition in compliance markets 2️⃣ Explicit government endorsement (certification + direct procurement) 3️⃣ Entry into the climate mainstream 👀 In case you missed it, make sure to tune into the 2025 review and 2026 forecast  Eve Tamme  and I released over the break (link in comments) where we dive into the above and much more in the usual, punchy format. 😶‍🌫️ Today, I want to share somet

What makes me so confident? Here a few highlights I expect: 🏛️ First-ever government purchase of durable CDR 📈 EU ETS integration 🧾 First EU CRCF-certified credits could be a real milestone 🌍 Rise of international credits Tune into the latest  CDR Policy Scoop  for the deep dive, as well as  Eve Tamme ’s list. 🎧 Listen here:  https://lnkd.in/d4sEDUdb   ▶️ Watch on YouTube:  https://lnkd.in/d9W7sSCW ❓What do you think will move the needle most next year?

🗓️ To wrap up the year, Eve Tamme and I recorded a CDR Policy Scoop episode reflecting on the biggest CDR policy developments of 2025 - from very different angles. 📉 From my side, the biggest low point was the US retreat from climate leadership: withdrawal from Paris, attacks on climate science, and frozen DAC funding all had real impacts on carbon removal. 🇪🇺 At the same time, leadership didn’t disappear, it just shifted. Europe stepped into the spotlight with: 1️⃣ Carb

💭 Like most people, I prefer to imagine a future without fossil fuels. Yet the reality is sobering: oil & gas (O&G) is set to remain a part of the global energy system for years to come, likely even decades. ⛽ That raises an uncomfortable but unavoidable question: if we can’t get rid of O&G fast enough, should we at least decarbonise it as aggressively as possible? Or does that risk locking it in forever? 🔥 That’s exactly the conversation I’ll be having -live here on Linked

🎯 A final agreement has been reached: 5% international credits (1990 levels) plus a potential additional 5% (2005 levels) at member state level. 📈 Starting as early as 2031, we are talking 100s of megatons, potentially more than a gigaton worth of credits (we are still thin on details). 📋 But what credits exactly? So far, all we have is reference to “high-quality” and a reference to the Paris Agreement. It will be up to the EU Commission to prepare an impact assessment and

🤔 Are you paying or being paid fairly? What jobs are particularly in demand? How big are regional differences? 📄 At CDRjobs, we just published the second edition of our annual compensation report and it is packed with insights! 📊 For 2025, we almost tripled the amount of job data we analysed to over 4,000 jobs in carbon removal! Some highlights: 🌍 The global median annual salary dropped 12% to $100k 💶 Without the U.S., the median is $70 (also 12% below 2024) 📍 The U.S.