top of page

šŸ›žAre governments around the world reinventing the wheel? šŸ›ž


šŸ›ļø Carbon removal is increasingly shifting from voluntary to government-regulated markets. In the process, concepts such as durability, additionality, liability, etc. have to be defined.


šŸ˜µā€šŸ’« In practice, what seems to be happening - and which I have written a lot about previously - is that we end up with a plethora of different approaches, increasing vs reducing complexity.


šŸ”’ Take durability. Definitions vary from decades, to centuries, to millennia, to none at all.


šŸ” My belief, however, is that we need to create a fungible market for CDR. A market where one ton of CDR becomes interchangeable with another ton of CDR, no matter where or how it was produced.


šŸ¤” So how do we get there? Luckily, we have gathered almost two decades of experience on most relevant issues on the voluntary carbon market (hashtag#VCM). It provides answers to many issues and principles/standards that could help us harmonise our approach.


🤩 Few have played a more important role in shaping these VCM guidelines than Alexia Kelly. So no better guest to join a CDR Policy Scoop discussion on the topic with Eve Tamme and I than her.


šŸ—“ļø Make sure to tune in on Monday, 23rd of June at 10 AM PT | 1 PM EST | 6 PM CEST: https://lnkd.in/gu3mSmNJ


šŸ‘‡ What is your take: should governments replicate or innovate? Should the VCM shape or be shaped by governments? Leave your comments below and we will integrate them into our session.



Recent Posts

See All
šŸ‡ŖšŸ‡ŗ Time to ramp up EU CDR policy work

šŸ“£ No surprises here: I believe the EU holds the key to scaling carbon removal policy. As such, I am thrilled to join the Board ofĀ  Negative Emissions Platform Ā (NEP), Europe’s most established indust

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments


  • LinkedIn

© 2026 SEBASTIAN MANHART

bottom of page