top of page

đŸ‡©đŸ‡° Is the world’s most progressive CDR country on track? đŸ‡©đŸ‡°




♄ If you follow me, you know I LOVE writing about Denmark. No other country has done as much - comparatively - for CDR as Denmark:

â–Ș Implemented the world’s first €100/t livestock tax, with proceeds used for CDR

â–Ș Created a $4.2b CCS fund, which covers BECCS

â–Ș Created a $1.5b biochar carbon removal (BCR) fund

â–Ș Implemented the world’s first government BCR strategy


đŸ˜± As a reminder, these two funds alone would be the equivalent of the U.S. putting $320b into CDR (and some CCS). These are *huge* amounts.


🎯 Denmark also has what many see as one of the most ambitious emission reduction targets in the world: 70% by 2030 (1990 levels), way ahead of the EU’s own 55% target. And Denmark is aiming for net-zero in 2045 and net-negative (110%) in 2050.


🔎 In its 2025 status report, the Danish Climate Council (independent government institution) now assesses its progress and provides an incredibly detailed view of the role of CDR in Danish climate policy.


👏 First, it states that Denmark is on track to hit 70% reductions by 2030. Congrats, that is simply incredible.


🚜 It then foresees around 7Mt of residual emissions in 2050, of which 80-90% will come from agriculture. To compensate these, it will need CDR and suggests the following split:

â–Ș 1-2Mt BCR

â–Ș 2Mt AF/RF

â–Ș 3-4Mt BECCS


🏭 To get there, it recommends:

â–Ș Pre 2030: BECCS deployment, DACCS R&D, robust certification

â–Ș Post 2030: cautious CDR ETS integration, develop CO2 storage, expand BCR


⚠ While fully supportive of scaling CDR, it does highlight two key risks:

1ïžâƒŁ Mitigation deterrence, especially in the context of ETS integration, and the need to ensure that emission reductions always come first.

2ïžâƒŁ Sustainable use of biomass, especially for BECCS and in a context where incentives - such as ETS integration - could lead to an unsustainable uptick in biomass demand.


đŸ’Ș Overall, I found this report incredibly refreshing. In a time when many governments still see CDR as something experimental to do some R&D on, Denmark shows that CDR can and should be fully integrated into climate and industrial policy. Not in 2030 or 2035, but today.




Comments


  • LinkedIn

© 2025 SEBASTIAN MANHART

bottom of page