top of page

๐Ÿ“Š [Poll] Science Based Targets initiative's Corporate Net Zero Standard 2.0: Which of the three options to address corporate residual emissions should be adopted? ๐Ÿ“Š




๐Ÿ˜ It's out - finally. My feed has been blowing up with great analyses (see comments). What is your take? Which of the three suggested options do you support:


1๏ธโƒฃ Option 1 (requirement): Companies are required to set near- and long-term removal targets, including interim CDR milestones,ยน to address projected residual emissions.


2๏ธโƒฃ Option 2 (optional with recognition): Companies can set and receive recognition for removal targets to address projected residual emissions.


3๏ธโƒฃ Option 3 (flexibility of mechanism): Companies have the flexibility to address expected residual emissions either entirely through additional emissions reductions within their value chain, entirely through removals, or via a combination of both.


4๏ธโƒฃ None of them - let us know why.


๐Ÿ“† Make sure to join Robert Hรถglund and Eve Tamme tomorrow, Thursday 20th of March at 11.30am CET for a CDR Policy Scoop on this topic: https://lnkd.in/dbfuN5if


๐Ÿ’ช Exciting times for CDR, and lots of work to get done.




header.all-comments


  • LinkedIn

© 2026 SEBASTIAN MANHART

bottom of page