top of page

☝️ When Italy goes low, Denmark goes high


🤔 Is European industry losing its competitiveness because of the EU ETS, as Italy and many other countries are arguing? Not according to Denmark!


💪 In fact, the relentless climate pioneer think the ETS is not going far enough.


🇩🇰 Denmark just introduced a national CO2 tax of €17/tCO₂e in 2026, increasing annually to roughly €48–50/tCO₂e from 2030 for ETS-covered installations. This means that facilities in Denmark will have to pay the ETS price PLUS the domestic tax.


🪜 The system has two tiers, with significantly lower rates for mineralogical processes like cement versus other sectors like power or chemicals.


💶 The objective is to reduce Denmark’s exposure to ETS price volatility to guarantee more reliable revenue to be channelled into decarbonisation efforts, including CCUS/CDR.


📉 Just one example: a potential delay of the ETS 2 - as currently being discussed - could cost Denmark €500m/year in revenue. 


🇪🇺 Importantly, the reform does not interfere with the EU ETS cap, auctioning framework or price formation; it operates strictly as a national augmentation. The measure was notified to and approved by the European Commission.


🔎 Pricing measures are accompanied by targeted relief mechanisms and support instruments to mitigate competitiveness and distributional impacts, including up to €80m in tax relief by 2030 as well as reduces taxes on space heating and energy use.


💰 For me, the jury is still out. I have huge respect for Denmark’s holistic approach to decarbonisation: sticks for polluters and carrots for changemakers. But it does feel excessive to make an already burdensome ETS even more expensive.


🙋🏻‍♀️ Thoughts?


📩 Want to cut through the noise? Stay up to date with the top 10 CDR policy news with my monthly briefing, The GigaTen: https://lnkd.in/d2BKe7gr



1 Comment


smithhy
Jun 02

Really engaging perspective shared here. The comparison between different national approaches offers readers an interesting way to reflect on governance, public policy, and the values that shape decision-making at a country level. It encourages thoughtful discussion about how leadership choices can influence public trust, institutional effectiveness, and long-term outcomes. This topic connects well with ideas explored in a government executive education seminar & course in Copenhagen, Denmark, where professionals examine leadership practices, policy development, and strategies for effective governance in an evolving global landscape.

Like
  • LinkedIn

© 2026 SEBASTIAN MANHART

bottom of page