š¢ Is climate multi-laterlism a sinking ship?
- sebmanhart

- Oct 20
- 1 min read

š© Like many of you, Iāve been really taken aback by the IMOās decision last Friday to suspend the adoption of its planned maritime carbon price by a year.
š Details are starting to emerge on what happened, as shocked negotiators are taking stock of what this means for the IMO, and climate multilateralism in general.
šŗš² The tactics employed - especially by the U.S. - were completely unprecedented and caught supporters of this particular regulation off-guard.
𤷠So where do we move from here? And how on earth do we decarbonise sectors like shipping in this new world?
šļø Like many, I think we need to brace ourselves for a few tough years ahead. Climate multilateralism is now dictated by geopolitics. The days are gone where deals on climate could be made that went outside, or even against, geopolitical currents.
š¤ In my view, the focus needs to shift to national, and maybe regional (e.g. EU) efforts to keep some momentum going while the world hopefully returns to some sort of reason. Hopefully I will be proven wrong at COP30, but I doubt itā¦
šļø To discuss this hot topic, as well as what this all means for carbon removal within shipping and aviation in particular, the CDR Policy Scoop is thrilled to have Robert Hƶglund back on the show, who has written extensively on these two hard to abate sectors.
šļø Join me and Eve Tamme on Monday, October 27th at 9 am PDT šŗšø / noon EDT šŗšø / 6 pm CEST šŖšŗfor this timely conversation: https://lnkd.in/dCKEvdvD
ā Whatās your take? Where are we heading? What options do we have left now?
.png)



Comments