top of page
CDR library
Search


π£ Want to cut through all the noise in CDR?
The GigaTen is my monthly briefing, where I distill what is happening in the CDR into a compact and clear format. π‘ Get insights into policy and market developments by myself and others, featuring blogs, reports, blogs, and spotlights amazing women leaders in CDR. π Over 1700 subscribers love my TL;DR format. π© Sign up today to get the Top 10 CDR news of the month delivered straight to your inbox: https://lnkd.in/gJt3tSM9 π½οΈ Prefer a deeper dive and video format? Then yo
May 31


π± Practising what I preach: I applied biochar in my garden
βοΈ On Portugalβs coast, my adopted home, summers are hot and the wind quickly dries out any soil. My first summer there, I saw the impact on my terraced garden first hand: daily watering. πͺ¨ Time to superpower my fruit and veg, using the black gold I write about so much: biochar. πΏ Did you know that biochar increases plant-available water by up to 30%, can reduce nutrient leaching by up to 60%, and improves soil aggregate stability. Ah, and it also stores carbon for hundreds
May 18


π Focus on the trendline, not the headlines in CDR
π£οΈ Gave this short speech at a dinner at Zurich Climate Week and I thought you might all enjoy it. π Bold statement: 2026 is going to be - by far - the best year for CDR policy yet. ποΈ There are dozens of people in government working full time on CDR. Hundreds part-time. Thousands who are aware of CDR and support it. π¨π If you want to hear a concrete example check out the CDR Policy Scoop on inter-governmental CDR transactions that Eve Tamme and I recorded at Zurich Clim
May 13


πͺ¨ How much biochar does it take to compensate your individual carbon footprint?
π½οΈ Check out the full documentary "CHAR: Fighting Wildfires with Biochar" on Youtube: https://lnkd.in/ekewGGt3 π And if you feel inspired to buy some carbon removal today, head over to CDR Shops: https://www.cdr-shops.com/
May 12


βοΈ We let fear write our energy policy
βοΈ For most of my life, nuclear power felt like a betrayal of everything I stood for. π Growing up in the Alps, I was told which mushrooms to avoid in the forests near my home still radioactive from Chernobyl. The Greenpeace magazine I read told me nuclear power was the enemy of the planet. When Fukushima hit and Merkel announced Germany's nuclear exit, I strongly believed we were standing on the right side of history. π The science was never ambiguous. Nuclear is statisti
May 11


β No Net Zero Without Nuclear β
π€· Depending on who you ask, nuclear power is either humanity's best shot at a liveable planet or an expensive, dangerous distraction that we've already wasted too much time on. Recently, the technology that environmentalists spent decades fighting is suddenly everywhere: β’οΈ Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta have collectively contracted for over 13 gigawatts of nuclear power. β’οΈGlobal nuclear generation hit a record high in 2025 and is set to keep climbing. β’οΈ Investment i
May 7


π Will international carbon credits shape the future of EU decarbonisation? And what type exactly?
βοΈ Just over a year ago, I brought together most of the worldβs leading CDR companies from the Global South under the umbrella of the The Global South Carbon Dioxide Removal Coalition (GS CDR) CDR coalition. πͺ The premise was simple: the Global South is uniquely positioned to deliver the majority of high quality removals - in fact, it already is! Yet access to compliance markets in the Global North was far from certain. π― Little did we know that our work was so quickly goi
Apr 27


β No Net Zero Without Nuclear β
β‘ Something remarkable is happening in energy. The technology that environmentalists spent decades fighting is suddenly everywhere. β’οΈ Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta have collectively contracted for over 13 gigawatts of nuclear power. Global nuclear generation hit a record high in 2025 and is set to keep climbing. Investment in nuclear has risen 50% in five years and is expected to exceed $70 billion in 2025 alone. π The nuclear narrative is changing rapidly, alongside i
Mar 26


π What on earth are Long-term Strategies (LTS) under the Paris Agreement and do they even matter?
π Honest admission: I knew/know almost nothing about LTSs. In fact, I barely hear anyone talk about them. One exception is Harry Smith PhD , who actually wrote a full PhD about it. Here are a few things I learnt in our CDR Policy Scoop with Harry: π― Residual emissions in government plans are double what the CDR community assumes. We often talk about 5-15%. In LTSs, they are often more than double this. An even bigger issue: only 26 countries actually quantified their res
Mar 22


π§ Weekend podcast recommendation
π§ Navigating Net Zero with Alexia Kelly recently did an episode with Tisha Schuller on on Real Climate Progress and the Messy Middle. Sheβs an environmental activist turned strategic advisor to the oil and gas industry. π«£ Sounds uncomfortable right? This is exactly the type of conversations we need to be having. Like it or not. π Her argument, roughly: the climate community's refusal to engage constructively with oil and gas isn't principled. It's counterproductive.
Mar 14


π€― Net-zero or dying pensioners - seriously, how did we get to this point? π€―
ποΈ And this clip is not some fringe outlet: The Diary Of A CEO is one of the worldβs leading podcasts, with over a billion downloads/views to date. π I was fairly shocked by this episode with Konstantin Kisin . His discussion with host Steven Bartlett on global warming is yet another example of how we have moved from outright denying climate change to reframing it in misguided, binary outcomes: β Net-zero means destroying our economy. β Net-zero means killing pensioner
Feb 23


π‘ Corporate Net-Zero 2.0? π‘
π€ Clearly the current system is not working. But what needs fixing? And how exactly do we go about it? π Check out our latest CDR Policy Scoop episode with Robert HΓΆglund to find out more about his proposal for conditional net-zero targets: βΆοΈ Watch on YouTube: https://lnkd.in/eh_fJQy5 π§ Listen here: https://lnkd.in/eDWU7xG5
Feb 22
π A love letter to nature carbon removals π
π For too long, I have ignored you. Yet there you are: reliably removing 2 gigatons of CO2 year on year, while providing countless co-benefits to forests, animals, farmers, and us humans. πͺ Yes, we need to figure out how to compensate our emissions for the long-term. But this will take us years, yeah decades to scale up. In the meantime, you can help us lower warming at this crucial moment in time. β
I donβt need to tell you how to do your job: it comes natural to you. You
Feb 13


Jack changed my mind. Will he change yours?
β½ I used to have a pretty clear opinion on the role of oil and gas on the way to net zero: boycott and phase out basically. π«£ This is a very commonly held stance in the climate bubble. It is also one that is not particularly helpful. π Of course, we need to phase out fossil fuels as quickly as possible. β οΈ However, given the massive dependence of humanity on fossil fuels, there can be no net zero without decarbonising this sector. βοΈ And not all actors are the same: some ar
Feb 1


βοΈ Without Like-for-Like, net-zero does not stop warming
π³ There, I said it. A statement that will lead to a lot of nodding for some, and fury for othersβ¦ π It is also the takeaway from a fascinating paper just released by Carbon Gap and authored by Sylvain Delerce . π€ Quick recap: What is the Like-for-Like (LfL) principle? From the paper: βLike-for-Like neutralisation requires balancing anthropogenic GHG sources with removals by sinks of similar or greater permanence than the carbon pool the emissions originate from and / o
Jan 28
bottom of page
.png)